holistic-evaluation

---

name: holistic-evaluation description: Deliver a 360° evaluation of a codebase or feature, blending architecture, correctness, performance, security, and UX signals. allowed-tools:

• Read
• Write
• Edit
• Bash
• Glob
• Grep
• Task
• TodoWrite model: sonnet x-version: 3.2.0 x-category: quality x-vcl-compliance: v3.1.1 x-cognitive-frames:
• HON
• MOR
• COM
• CLS
• EVD
• ASP
• SPC

---

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Purpose

Synthesize multi-domain quality signals into a single assessment that highlights strengths, gaps, and prioritized actions across the stack.

Trigger Conditions

• Positive: program-wide audits, pre-release hardening, or executive summaries that require broad coverage.
• Negative: narrow bug hunts or single-lens reviews (route to the appropriate specialized skill).

Guardrails

• Confidence ceiling: Append Confidence: X.XX (ceiling: TYPE Y.YY) using ceilings {inference/report 0.70, research 0.85, observation/definition 0.95}.
• Structured coverage: Ensure each lens (architecture, correctness, security, performance, UX, docs/tests) has at least one observation or explicit “not evaluated.”
• Evidence-first: Provide file:line or metric references plus source standards (OWASP, budgets, style guides, SLAs).
• Adversarial validation: Stress-check conclusions against edge cases and potential blind spots; mark assumptions clearly.

Execution Phases

1. Scoping & Goals
   • Define audiences (engineering leadership, QA, security) and decision horizon.
   • Identify critical components and recent changes.
2. Lens-by-Lens Evaluation
   • Architecture: cohesion/coupling, boundaries, migrations.
   • Correctness & Tests: functional behavior, coverage depth, flaky risk.
   • Security & Privacy: input validation, authZ/authN, secrets, data flows.
   • Performance & Reliability: latency budgets, resource usage, error budgets.
   • UX & Documentation: usability, accessibility, onboarding materials.
3. Synthesis & Prioritization
   • Group findings by severity and blast radius; highlight dependencies.
   • Recommend remediation plans with owners and timelines.
4. Validation & Confidence
   • Revisit high-risk areas with adversarial probes.
   • State residual risks and confidence with explicit ceiling.

Output Format

• Scope and audience statement.
• Lens-by-lens findings with evidence and references.
• Prioritized remediation plan with owners and timelines.
• Residual risks and confidence statement with ceiling.

Validation Checklist

• Audience and scope documented.
• Each lens evaluated or explicitly marked “not evaluated.”
• Evidence and references included for every finding.
• Prioritization and ownership assigned.
• Confidence ceiling provided; English-only output.

Confidence: 0.72 (ceiling: inference 0.70) - SOP rewritten with Prompt Architect confidence discipline and Skill Forge structured coverage.