Marketplace

writing-plans

Creates comprehensive implementation plans with exact file paths, complete code examples, and verification steps for engineers with zero codebase context. Assumes skilled developers who need domain-specific guidance, following DRY, YAGNI, and TDD principles. Use after brainstorming/design is complete when handing off to another developer or planning complex multi-step work. Do NOT use for simple tasks, quick fixes, or when you're implementing yourself and already understand the codebase - just start coding instead.

$ Instalar

git clone https://github.com/jrc1883/popkit-claude /tmp/popkit-claude && cp -r /tmp/popkit-claude/packages/popkit-dev/skills/pop-writing-plans ~/.claude/skills/popkit-claude

// tip: Run this command in your terminal to install the skill


name: writing-plans description: "Creates comprehensive implementation plans with exact file paths, complete code examples, and verification steps for engineers with zero codebase context. Assumes skilled developers who need domain-specific guidance, following DRY, YAGNI, and TDD principles. Use after brainstorming/design is complete when handing off to another developer or planning complex multi-step work. Do NOT use for simple tasks, quick fixes, or when you're implementing yourself and already understand the codebase - just start coding instead." inputs:

  • from: pop-brainstorming field: design_document required: false
  • from: any field: topic required: false outputs:
  • field: plan_document type: file_path
  • field: github_issue type: issue_number
  • field: task_count type: number next_skills:
  • pop-executing-plans
  • pop-subagent-driven workflow: id: writing-plans name: Plan Creation Workflow version: 1 description: Create comprehensive implementation plans with validation steps:
    • id: check_context description: Check for upstream context from brainstorming type: skill skill: pop-knowledge-lookup next: context_decision
    • id: context_decision description: Decide how to proceed with available context type: user_decision question: "Do you have design context to start from?" header: "Context" options:
      • id: from_design label: "From design" description: "Use existing design document" next: gather_requirements
      • id: from_issue label: "From issue" description: "Use GitHub issue as input" next: gather_requirements
      • id: fresh label: "Start fresh" description: "No existing context" next: gather_requirements next_map: from_design: gather_requirements from_issue: gather_requirements fresh: gather_requirements
    • id: gather_requirements description: Gather and understand requirements type: agent agent: code-explorer next: approach_decision
    • id: approach_decision description: Choose planning approach type: user_decision question: "What level of detail for the plan?" header: "Detail" options:
      • id: comprehensive label: "Comprehensive" description: "Full TDD with every step documented" next: write_plan
      • id: standard label: "Standard" description: "Task-level with code examples" next: write_plan
      • id: outline label: "Outline" description: "High-level tasks only" next: write_plan next_map: comprehensive: write_plan standard: write_plan outline: write_plan
    • id: write_plan description: Write the implementation plan type: agent agent: code-architect next: validate_plan
    • id: validate_plan description: Validate plan structure and completeness type: skill skill: pop-validation-engine next: validation_result
    • id: validation_result description: Review validation results type: user_decision question: "Plan validation complete. How to proceed?" header: "Validation" options:
      • id: approved label: "Approved" description: "Plan is complete and correct" next: github_decision
      • id: revise label: "Revise" description: "Need to fix issues" next: write_plan next_map: approved: github_decision revise: write_plan
    • id: github_decision description: Decide on GitHub issue integration type: user_decision question: "Create or link a GitHub issue for tracking?" header: "GitHub" options:
      • id: create label: "Create issue" description: "Create new tracking issue" next: create_issue
      • id: link label: "Link existing" description: "Link to existing issue" next: link_issue
      • id: skip label: "Skip" description: "No GitHub tracking" next: execution_decision next_map: create: create_issue link: link_issue skip: execution_decision
    • id: create_issue description: Create GitHub issue with task checklist type: skill skill: pop-research-capture next: execution_decision
    • id: link_issue description: Link plan to existing issue type: skill skill: pop-knowledge-lookup next: execution_decision
    • id: execution_decision description: Choose how to execute the plan type: user_decision question: "Plan saved. How would you like to execute it?" header: "Execution" options:
      • id: subagent label: "Subagent-Driven" description: "Execute now with fresh subagent per task" next: execute_subagent
      • id: parallel label: "Parallel Session" description: "Open new session with executing-plans" next: complete
      • id: later label: "Later" description: "Save for manual execution" next: complete next_map: subagent: execute_subagent parallel: complete later: complete
    • id: execute_subagent description: Execute plan with subagent-driven approach type: skill skill: pop-subagent-dev next: complete
    • id: complete description: Plan creation workflow complete type: terminal

Writing Plans

Overview

Write comprehensive implementation plans assuming the engineer has zero context for our codebase and questionable taste. Document everything they need to know: which files to touch for each task, code, testing, docs they might need to check, how to test it. Give them the whole plan as bite-sized tasks. DRY. YAGNI. TDD. Frequent commits.

Assume they are a skilled developer, but know almost nothing about our toolset or problem domain. Assume they don't know good test design very well.

Announce at start: "I'm using the writing-plans skill to create the implementation plan."

Save plans to: docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature-name>.md

Step 0: Check Upstream Context

BEFORE creating a plan, check for context from previous skills:

from popkit_shared.utils.skill_context import load_skill_context, get_artifact

# Check for design context from brainstorming
ctx = load_skill_context()

if ctx and ctx.previous_skill == "pop-brainstorming":
    # Use design document as input
    design_doc = get_artifact("design_document") or ctx.artifacts.get("design_document")
    topic = ctx.previous_output.get("topic")
    approach = ctx.previous_output.get("approach")

    # Don't re-ask decisions that were already made
    existing_decisions = ctx.shared_decisions

    print(f"Using design from brainstorming: {design_doc}")
    print(f"Topic: {topic}, Approach: {approach}")
else:
    # No upstream context - need to gather information
    # Check for existing design docs
    design_doc = None

If design document exists, read it first instead of asking questions already answered.

Bite-Sized Task Granularity

Each step is one action (2-5 minutes):

  • "Write the failing test" - step
  • "Run it to make sure it fails" - step
  • "Implement the minimal code to make the test pass" - step
  • "Run the tests and make sure they pass" - step
  • "Commit" - step

Plan Document Header

Every plan MUST start with this header:

# [Feature Name] Implementation Plan

> **For Claude:** Use executing-plans skill to implement this plan task-by-task.

**Goal:** [One sentence describing what this builds]

**Architecture:** [2-3 sentences about approach]

**Tech Stack:** [Key technologies/libraries]

---

Task Structure

### Task N: [Component Name]

**Files:**

- Create: `exact/path/to/file.py`
- Modify: `exact/path/to/existing.py:123-145`
- Test: `tests/exact/path/to/test.py`

**Step 1: Write the failing test**

\`\`\`python
def test_specific_behavior():
result = function(input)
assert result == expected
\`\`\`

**Step 2: Run test to verify it fails**

Run: `pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v`
Expected: FAIL with "function not defined"

**Step 3: Write minimal implementation**

\`\`\`python
def function(input):
return expected
\`\`\`

**Step 4: Run test to verify it passes**

Run: `pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v`
Expected: PASS

**Step 5: Commit**

\`\`\`bash
git add tests/path/test.py src/path/file.py
git commit -m "feat: add specific feature"
\`\`\`

Remember

  • Exact file paths always
  • Complete code in plan (not "add validation")
  • Exact commands with expected output
  • Reference relevant skills with @ syntax
  • DRY, YAGNI, TDD, frequent commits

After Plan Created: GitHub Issue

Check for existing issue or create one:

# Search for existing issue
gh issue list --search "<topic>" --state open --json number,title --limit 5

If no issue exists, offer to create:

Use AskUserQuestion tool with:
- question: "No GitHub issue exists for this work. Create one?"
- header: "Issue"
- options:
  - label: "Create issue"
    description: "Create tracking issue with plan summary and task checklist"
  - label: "Link existing"
    description: "I'll provide an issue number to link"
  - label: "Skip"
    description: "Don't track in GitHub"
- multiSelect: false

If creating issue:

gh issue create --title "[Feature] <topic>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
<brief description>

## Implementation Plan
See: `docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature>.md`

## Tasks
- [ ] Task 1
- [ ] Task 2
...

---
*Plan created by PopKit*
EOF
)"

Context Output (for downstream skills)

from popkit_shared.utils.skill_context import save_skill_context, SkillOutput, link_workflow_to_issue

# Save plan context for executing-plans or subagent-driven
save_skill_context(SkillOutput(
    skill_name="pop-writing-plans",
    status="completed",
    output={
        "plan_file": "docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature>.md",
        "task_count": <number of tasks>,
        "github_issue": <issue number if created>
    },
    artifacts=["docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature>.md"],
    next_suggested="pop-executing-plans",
    decisions_made=[<list of AskUserQuestion results>]
))

# Link to GitHub issue
if issue_number:
    link_workflow_to_issue(issue_number)

Execution Handoff

After saving the plan, use AskUserQuestion to offer execution choice:

Use AskUserQuestion tool with:
- question: "Plan saved. How would you like to execute it?"
- header: "Execution"
- options:
  - label: "Subagent-Driven"
    description: "Execute in this session with fresh subagent per task"
  - label: "Parallel Session"
    description: "Open new session with executing-plans skill"
  - label: "Later"
    description: "Save for now, I'll execute it manually"
- multiSelect: false

NEVER present as plain text like "1. Subagent, 2. Parallel... type 1 or 2".

If Subagent-Driven chosen:

  • Use subagent-driven-development skill
  • Stay in this session
  • Fresh subagent per task + code review
  • Context automatically passed via skill_context

If Parallel Session chosen:

  • Guide them to open new session in worktree
  • New session uses executing-plans skill
  • Context available via .popkit/context/current-workflow.json