name: architecture-paradigm-space-based description: | Data-grid architecture for high-traffic stateful workloads with linear scalability.

Triggers: space-based, data grid, in-memory, linear scaling, high traffic Use when: traffic overwhelms database nodes or linear scalability needed DO NOT use when: data doesn't fit in memory or simpler caching would work. version: 1.0.0 category: architectural-pattern tags: [architecture, space-based, data-grid, scalability, in-memory, stateful] dependencies: [] tools: [data-grid-platform, replication-manager, load-tester] usage_patterns:

• paradigm-implementation
• high-traffic-workloads
• linear-scalability complexity: high estimated_tokens: 800

The Space-Based Architecture Paradigm

When to Employ This Paradigm

• When traffic or state volume overwhelms a single database node.
• When latency requirements demand in-memory data grids located close to processing units.
• When linear scalability is required, achieved by partitioning workloads across many identical, self-sufficient units.

Adoption Steps

1. Partition Workloads: Divide traffic and data into processing units, each backed by a replicated data cache.
2. Design the Data Grid: Select the appropriate caching technology, replication strategy (synchronous vs. asynchronous), and data eviction policies.
3. Coordinate Persistence: Implement a write-through or write-behind strategy to a durable data store, including reconciliation processes.
4. Implement Failover Handling: Design a mechanism for leader election or heartbeats to validate recovery from node loss without data loss.
5. Validate Scalability: Conduct load and chaos testing to confirm the system's elasticity and self-healing capabilities.

Key Deliverables

• An Architecture Decision Record (ADR) detailing the chosen grid technology, partitioning scheme, and durability strategy.
• Runbooks for scaling processing units and for recovering from "split-brain" scenarios.
• A monitoring suite to track cache hit rates, replication lag, and failover events.

Risks & Mitigations

• Eventual Consistency Issues:
  • Mitigation: Formally document data-freshness Service Level Agreements (SLAs) and implement compensation logic for data that is not immediately consistent.
• Operational Complexity:
  • Mitigation: The orchestration of a data grid requires mature automation. Invest in production-grade tooling and automation early in the process.
• Cost:
  • Mitigation: In-memory grids can be resource-intensive. Implement aggressive monitoring of utilization and auto-scaling policies to manage costs effectively.