Unnamed Skill
This skill orchestrates autonomous sprint execution by coordinating subagents to implement GitHub issues serially. It manages the full lifecycle: generating implementation plans via Gemini CLI, delegating implementation to subagents, reviewing PRs with Codex MCP, merging approved code, and running post-merge integration. Use this skill when asked to "run a sprint", "execute sprint issues", "implement issues autonomously", or "manage sprint workflow".
$ Installer
git clone https://github.com/bodangren/git-workflow /tmp/git-workflow && cp -r /tmp/git-workflow/skills/sprint-manager ~/.claude/skills/git-workflow// tip: Run this command in your terminal to install the skill
name: sprint-manager description: This skill orchestrates autonomous sprint execution by coordinating subagents to implement GitHub issues serially. It manages the full lifecycle: generating implementation plans via Gemini CLI, delegating implementation to subagents, reviewing PRs with Codex MCP, merging approved code, and running post-merge integration. Use this skill when asked to "run a sprint", "execute sprint issues", "implement issues autonomously", or "manage sprint workflow".
Sprint Manager
Purpose
To autonomously execute a sprint by coordinating the implementation of GitHub issues through a structured workflow that leverages subagents for isolated work and maintains a clean context window for sprint-level coordination.
When to Use
Use this skill in the following situations:
- Starting work on a set of sprint issues from a GitHub milestone
- Implementing multiple issues autonomously with minimal user intervention
- Coordinating a development workflow that requires code review and integration
- Managing serial execution of dependent or independent issues
Prerequisites
- GitHub repository with issues assigned to a milestone
- Git working directory is clean (no uncommitted changes)
ghCLI tool installed and authenticatedgeminiCLI tool installed and authenticated (optional, for plan generation)- Codex MCP available for PR review
- Project has
issue-executorandchange-integratorskills (or equivalent workflow)
Architecture
The sprint manager operates as a coordinator that delegates work to subagents:
Sprint Manager (main context)
â
âââ For each issue:
â âââ 1. Generate implementation plan (Gemini CLI or manual)
â âââ 2. Create feature branch
â âââ 3. Launch implementer subagent â creates PR
â âââ 4. Review PR (Codex MCP)
â âââ 5. Fix issues if needed (another subagent)
â âââ 6. Merge on approval
â âââ 7. Launch integrator subagent â cleanup & retrospective
â
âââ Report sprint summary
Core Workflow
Phase 1: Sprint Setup
-
Identify sprint issues by querying the GitHub milestone:
gh issue list --milestone "Sprint X" --state open --json number,title,labels -
Prioritize issues based on labels (P0 > P1 > P2) and dependencies
-
Track progress using the TodoWrite tool with all sprint issues
Phase 2: Issue Execution Loop
For each issue in priority order:
Step 1: Generate Implementation Plan
Option A - Use issue-executor skill (if Gemini available):
bash scripts/work-on-issue.sh <issue-number>
Option B - Manual plan generation:
- Fetch issue details:
gh issue view <number> --json title,body - Read relevant specs from
docs/specs/ordocs/changes/ - Call Gemini CLI with context to generate a step-by-step plan
- Create feature branch following convention:
feat/<number>-<kebab-title>
Step 2: Delegate Implementation to Subagent
Launch a Task subagent with a comprehensive prompt including:
- Issue number and acceptance criteria
- Implementation plan from Step 1
- Project conventions (from CLAUDE.md)
- File paths and schema context
- Expected deliverables (PR URL, test results, files created)
- Fallback instructions if tools fail
Select appropriate subagent type based on the issue:
backend-architect- API routes, database schemas, backend logicfrontend-developer- React components, UI, client-side codegeneral-purpose- Mixed or unclear scope
Example prompt structure (see references/implementer-prompt-template.md):
## Task: Implement GitHub Issue #<number> - <title>
You are working on branch `<branch-name>` in `<working-directory>`.
### Issue Summary
<brief description>
### Implementation Plan
<step-by-step plan from Gemini or manual>
### Project Conventions
<key conventions from CLAUDE.md>
### Your Deliverables
1. Implement the code
2. Run lint and tests
3. Commit with conventional commit message
4. Push and create PR
### Report Back
<what to return: PR URL, test results, issues encountered>
Step 3: Review PR with Codex MCP
After subagent returns with PR URL:
mcp__codex__codex with prompt:
"Review PR #<number>: <title>
URL: <pr-url>
The PR implements: <summary>
Focus your review on: <relevant concerns>
Say APPROVED if ready to merge, or list issues with severity."
Step 4: Handle Review Feedback
If Codex finds issues:
- Launch another subagent to fix the issues
- Provide specific fix instructions from Codex feedback
- Re-review after fixes are pushed
If Codex approves:
- Proceed to merge
Step 5: Merge PR
gh pr merge <number> --squash --auto
Wait for CI to pass, then verify merge:
gh pr view <number> --json state
Step 6: Post-Merge Integration
Launch integrator subagent (see references/integrator-prompt-template.md):
- Switch to main and pull latest
- Delete feature branch (local and remote)
- Update retrospective with learnings
- Close issue if not auto-closed
- Report completion status
Phase 3: Sprint Completion
After all issues are processed:
- Update TodoWrite to mark all issues complete
- Summarize sprint results:
- Issues completed
- PRs merged
- Key learnings
- Any blockers encountered
- Report to user
Error Handling
Gemini CLI Fails
If the Gemini CLI fails during plan generation:
- Fall back to manual plan creation
- Read issue details directly via
gh issue view - Check relevant specs in
docs/specs/ordocs/changes/ - Construct implementation plan based on acceptance criteria
Subagent Fails
If an implementer subagent fails:
- Review the error reported
- Launch a new subagent with adjusted instructions
- Consider breaking the task into smaller pieces
- Flag for user intervention if repeated failures
Codex Review Times Out
If Codex MCP doesn't respond:
- Retry the review request
- Fall back to basic automated checks (lint, tests)
- Flag PR for user manual review
PR Merge Conflicts
If merge fails due to conflicts:
- Rebase the branch on main
- Launch subagent to resolve conflicts
- Re-run tests and review
Prompt Templates
See the references/ directory for detailed prompt templates:
references/implementer-prompt-template.md- Template for implementation subagentsreferences/integrator-prompt-template.md- Template for post-merge integration subagentsreferences/review-prompt-template.md- Template for Codex PR reviews
Best Practices
Context Management
- Keep sprint-level state in the main context (issue tracking, PR URLs, blockers)
- Delegate all implementation details to subagents
- Each subagent gets a fresh context - include all needed info in the prompt
Prompt Crafting
- Be specific about file paths and existing code context
- Include project conventions explicitly (subagents don't read CLAUDE.md)
- Specify exact deliverables and report format
- Provide fallback instructions for common failure modes
Serial vs Parallel
- Default to serial execution for safety and easier debugging
- Only parallelize truly independent issues with explicit user approval
- Never parallelize issues with shared file dependencies
User Communication
- Report progress after each issue completes
- Flag blockers immediately rather than retrying indefinitely
- Provide sprint summary at the end
Notes
- This skill is designed for serial execution to maintain context clarity
- Each issue gets its own subagent context, keeping the main context clean
- The workflow integrates with existing issue-executor and change-integrator skills
- Codex MCP provides automated code review without user intervention
- Retrospective updates capture learnings for future sprints
Repository
