---

name: license-compliance description: Open source license compliance including compatibility analysis, obligations tracking, and compliance workflows allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Write, Edit, Task

Open Source License Compliance

Comprehensive guidance for open source license compliance before and during development.

When to Use This Skill

• Evaluating open source dependencies for new projects
• Checking license compatibility between packages
• Understanding obligations for distribution
• Creating attribution notices and NOTICES files
• Establishing license policies for your organization

License Categories

Permissive Licenses

Allow use, modification, and distribution with minimal restrictions.

License	Obligations	Commercial Use	Patent Grant
MIT	Attribution	✓	No
BSD-2-Clause	Attribution	✓	No
BSD-3-Clause	Attribution, no endorsement	✓	No
Apache-2.0	Attribution, state changes, NOTICE	✓	Yes
ISC	Attribution	✓	No

Copyleft Licenses

Require derivative works to use the same license.

License	Copyleft Scope	SaaS Trigger	Distribution Obligations
GPL-2.0	Strong	No	Source disclosure
GPL-3.0	Strong	No	Source disclosure, anti-Tivoization
LGPL-2.1	Weak (library)	No	Source for library, linking allowed
AGPL-3.0	Strong + Network	Yes	Source disclosure on network use
MPL-2.0	File-level	No	Source for modified files
EPL-2.0	Module-level	No	Source for modified modules

Weak Copyleft vs Strong Copyleft

Strong Copyleft (GPL):
┌──────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  Your Application (becomes GPL)          │
│  ┌──────────────────────────────────┐   │
│  │  GPL Library (linked/included)   │   │
│  └──────────────────────────────────┘   │
└──────────────────────────────────────────┘

Weak Copyleft (LGPL):
┌──────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  Your Application (any license)          │
│  ↓ dynamic link                          │
│  ┌──────────────────────────────────┐   │
│  │  LGPL Library (LGPL remains)     │   │
│  └──────────────────────────────────┘   │
└──────────────────────────────────────────┘

License Compatibility

Compatibility Matrix

Inbound License → Outbound License Compatibility

FROM ↓ / TO →  | MIT | Apache | BSD | LGPL | MPL | GPL | AGPL
---------------|-----|--------|-----|------|-----|-----|------
MIT            |  ✓  |   ✓    |  ✓  |  ✓   |  ✓  |  ✓  |  ✓
Apache-2.0     |  ✗  |   ✓    |  ✗  |  ✓   |  ✓  |  ✓* |  ✓*
BSD-3-Clause   |  ✓  |   ✓    |  ✓  |  ✓   |  ✓  |  ✓  |  ✓
LGPL-2.1       |  ✗  |   ✗    |  ✗  |  ✓   |  ✗  |  ✓  |  ✓
MPL-2.0        |  ✗  |   ✗    |  ✗  |  ✗   |  ✓  |  ✓  |  ✓
GPL-2.0        |  ✗  |   ✗    |  ✗  |  ✗   |  ✗  |  ✓  |  ✗
GPL-3.0        |  ✗  |   ✗    |  ✗  |  ✗   |  ✗  |  ✓  |  ✓
AGPL-3.0       |  ✗  |   ✗    |  ✗  |  ✗   |  ✗  |  ✗  |  ✓

✓ = Compatible, ✗ = Incompatible
* GPL-3.0 only (Apache-2.0 incompatible with GPL-2.0)

Common Compatibility Issues

Issue	Example	Resolution
GPL + Proprietary	Using GPL library in closed source	Use LGPL alternative or open source
Apache + GPL-2.0	Combining Apache-2.0 with GPL-2.0	Upgrade to GPL-3.0
AGPL + SaaS	Using AGPL in web service	Open source your code or use alternative
Conflicting Copyleft	GPL + EPL in same binary	Separate into distinct programs

Obligation Analysis by Use Case

Internal Use Only

License Type	Obligations	Tracking Required
Permissive	None	Minimal
Weak Copyleft	None	Minimal
Strong Copyleft	None (no distribution)	Minimal
AGPL	Source available if network service	Yes

Distribution (Desktop/Mobile)

License Type	Obligations
MIT, BSD, ISC	Include license/copyright in distribution
Apache-2.0	Include license, NOTICE file, state changes
LGPL	Provide library source, allow relinking
GPL	Provide complete source code
MPL	Provide modified file source

SaaS (No Binary Distribution)

License Type	Obligations
Permissive	None (no distribution)
GPL, LGPL	None (no distribution)
AGPL	Must provide source to users

License Compliance Implementation

.NET Dependency Analysis

// License scanning integration
public class LicenseComplianceChecker
{
    private readonly IPackageMetadataProvider _packageProvider;
    private readonly LicensePolicy _policy;

    public async Task<ComplianceReport> AnalyzeProject(
        string projectPath,
        CancellationToken ct)
    {
        var packages = await _packageProvider.GetPackages(projectPath, ct);
        var report = new ComplianceReport();

        foreach (var package in packages)
        {
            var license = await _packageProvider.GetLicense(package, ct);

            var evaluation = _policy.Evaluate(license);

            report.Packages.Add(new PackageLicenseInfo
            {
                PackageId = package.Id,
                Version = package.Version,
                License = license.SpdxIdentifier,
                LicenseUrl = license.Url,
                Category = license.Category,
                Status = evaluation.Status,
                Obligations = evaluation.Obligations,
                Issues = evaluation.Issues
            });
        }

        return report;
    }
}

public class LicensePolicy
{
    private readonly HashSet<string> _approved = new()
    {
        "MIT", "Apache-2.0", "BSD-2-Clause", "BSD-3-Clause", "ISC"
    };

    private readonly HashSet<string> _requiresReview = new()
    {
        "LGPL-2.1", "LGPL-3.0", "MPL-2.0", "EPL-2.0"
    };

    private readonly HashSet<string> _prohibited = new()
    {
        "GPL-2.0", "GPL-3.0", "AGPL-3.0"
    };

    public PolicyEvaluation Evaluate(LicenseInfo license)
    {
        if (_approved.Contains(license.SpdxIdentifier))
        {
            return new PolicyEvaluation
            {
                Status = PolicyStatus.Approved,
                Obligations = GetObligations(license.SpdxIdentifier)
            };
        }

        if (_requiresReview.Contains(license.SpdxIdentifier))
        {
            return new PolicyEvaluation
            {
                Status = PolicyStatus.RequiresReview,
                Obligations = GetObligations(license.SpdxIdentifier),
                Issues = new[] { "Copyleft license requires legal review" }
            };
        }

        if (_prohibited.Contains(license.SpdxIdentifier))
        {
            return new PolicyEvaluation
            {
                Status = PolicyStatus.Prohibited,
                Issues = new[] { "Strong copyleft incompatible with proprietary distribution" }
            };
        }

        return new PolicyEvaluation
        {
            Status = PolicyStatus.Unknown,
            Issues = new[] { $"Unknown license: {license.SpdxIdentifier}" }
        };
    }
}

Attribution and NOTICE Files

// NOTICE file generator
public class NoticeFileGenerator
{
    public string GenerateNotice(IEnumerable<PackageLicenseInfo> packages)
    {
        var sb = new StringBuilder();

        sb.AppendLine("THIRD-PARTY SOFTWARE NOTICES AND INFORMATION");
        sb.AppendLine("=============================================");
        sb.AppendLine();
        sb.AppendLine("This software includes the following third-party components:");
        sb.AppendLine();

        foreach (var pkg in packages.OrderBy(p => p.PackageId))
        {
            sb.AppendLine($"## {pkg.PackageId} ({pkg.Version})");
            sb.AppendLine($"License: {pkg.License}");
            sb.AppendLine($"URL: {pkg.LicenseUrl}");
            sb.AppendLine();

            if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(pkg.Copyright))
            {
                sb.AppendLine(pkg.Copyright);
                sb.AppendLine();
            }

            if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(pkg.LicenseText))
            {
                sb.AppendLine("License Text:");
                sb.AppendLine(pkg.LicenseText);
                sb.AppendLine();
            }

            sb.AppendLine("---");
            sb.AppendLine();
        }

        return sb.ToString();
    }
}

.NET Project Configuration

<!-- Enable license metadata in build -->
<PropertyGroup>
  <GeneratePackageOnBuild>true</GeneratePackageOnBuild>
</PropertyGroup>

<ItemGroup>
  <!-- Include NOTICE file in package -->
  <None Include="NOTICE.txt" Pack="true" PackagePath="" />

  <!-- Set license expression for your package -->
  <PackageLicenseExpression>MIT</PackageLicenseExpression>
  <!-- OR for file-based license -->
  <PackageLicenseFile>LICENSE.txt</PackageLicenseFile>
</ItemGroup>

License Policy Template

Organizational License Policy

# Open Source License Policy

## 1. Purpose
This policy governs the use of open source software in [Organization] products.

## 2. License Categories

### 2.1 Approved Licenses (No Review Required)
- MIT
- Apache-2.0
- BSD-2-Clause
- BSD-3-Clause
- ISC
- Unlicense
- CC0-1.0

### 2.2 Requires Review
- LGPL-2.1, LGPL-3.0 (weak copyleft - usage context matters)
- MPL-2.0, EPL-2.0 (file/module-level copyleft)
- Creative Commons (varies by type)
- Dual-licensed packages

### 2.3 Prohibited
- GPL-2.0, GPL-3.0 (strong copyleft - unless project is GPL)
- AGPL-3.0 (network copyleft)
- SSPL (Server Side Public License)
- Any license with field-of-use restrictions
- Unknown or custom licenses without legal review

## 3. Process

### 3.1 New Dependency Addition
1. Check license using `dotnet-license-check` or equivalent
2. If Approved: Proceed, ensure attribution
3. If Requires Review: Submit to legal@company.com
4. If Prohibited: Find alternative or request exception

### 3.2 Distribution
Before any release:
1. Run license audit
2. Generate NOTICE file
3. Include required attribution
4. Archive source code for copyleft compliance

## 4. Exceptions
Exceptions require written approval from Legal and CTO.

## 5. Compliance Verification
- Automated scanning in CI/CD pipeline
- Quarterly manual audits
- Annual policy review

SPDX Identifiers

Common SPDX Identifiers

Permissive:
MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD-2-Clause, BSD-3-Clause, ISC, Unlicense, CC0-1.0

Weak Copyleft:
LGPL-2.1-only, LGPL-2.1-or-later, LGPL-3.0-only, LGPL-3.0-or-later
MPL-2.0, EPL-2.0, OSL-3.0

Strong Copyleft:
GPL-2.0-only, GPL-2.0-or-later, GPL-3.0-only, GPL-3.0-or-later
AGPL-3.0-only, AGPL-3.0-or-later

Compound Expressions:
(MIT OR Apache-2.0)  - Choice
(LGPL-2.1-only AND MIT)  - Both apply
GPL-2.0-only WITH Classpath-exception-2.0  - Exception

CI/CD Integration

License Scanning Pipeline

# GitHub Actions example
name: License Compliance Check

on:
  pull_request:
    paths:
      - '**/*.csproj'
      - '**/packages.lock.json'

jobs:
  license-check:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4

      - name: Setup .NET
        uses: actions/setup-dotnet@v4
        with:
          dotnet-version: '10.0.x'

      - name: Install license checker
        run: dotnet tool install --global dotnet-project-licenses

      - name: Check licenses
        run: |
          dotnet-project-licenses -i . \
            --allowed-license-types "MIT;Apache-2.0;BSD-2-Clause;BSD-3-Clause" \
            --output license-report.json \
            --output-type json

      - name: Upload license report
        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
        with:
          name: license-report
          path: license-report.json

      - name: Fail on prohibited licenses
        run: |
          if grep -q "GPL-" license-report.json; then
            echo "::error::Prohibited license detected"
            exit 1
          fi

License Compliance Checklist

Pre-Development

• Define license policy for project
• Identify project distribution model (SaaS/desktop/library)
• Determine outbound license for your code
• Establish dependency review process

During Development

• Check license before adding each dependency
• Maintain attribution in NOTICE file
• Document any exceptions
• Run license scanning in CI

Pre-Release

• Complete license audit
• Generate final NOTICE file
• Verify all attributions included
• Archive source for copyleft compliance
• Legal sign-off if required

Cross-References

• SBOM: sbom-management for dependency tracking
• Security: security-frameworks for secure supply chain
• Data Privacy: Consider data handling in dependencies

Resources

• SPDX License List
• Choose A License
• FOSSA - License Compliance
• OSI Approved Licenses