Marketplace
formatting-audits
Design document review format definition with 100-point scoring system. Provides quality evaluation criteria, scoring items, and pass/fail logic for SOW/Spec documents. Combined with confidence markers (✓/→/?) to clarify evaluation evidence. Triggers: SOW review, Spec review, document review, design review, ドキュメントレビュー, 設計レビュー, 90 points, scoring, grading, 品質評価, スコアリング, 合否判定.
allowed_tools: Read, Grep, Glob
$ Installer
git clone https://github.com/thkt/claude-config /tmp/claude-config && cp -r /tmp/claude-config/skills/formatting-audits ~/.claude/skills/claude-config// tip: Run this command in your terminal to install the skill
SKILL.md
name: formatting-audits description: > Design document review format definition with 100-point scoring system. Provides quality evaluation criteria, scoring items, and pass/fail logic for SOW/Spec documents. Combined with confidence markers (✓/→/?) to clarify evaluation evidence. Triggers: SOW review, Spec review, document review, design review, ドキュメントレビュー, 設計レビュー, 90 points, scoring, grading, 品質評価, スコアリング, 合否判定. allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob user-invocable: false
Review Format - Design Document Scoring
100-point scoring format for evaluating SOW/Spec document quality.
Scoring System
| Item | Score | Focus | Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | 0-25 | Facts vs inferences | ✓/→/? markers, evidence paths |
| Completeness | 0-25 | Coverage | Testable criteria, risks, dependencies |
| Relevance | 0-25 | Alignment | Goals ↔ solutions, scope, YAGNI |
| Actionability | 0-25 | Implementability | Specific steps, feasibility, next actions |
Judgment Criteria
| Score | Judgment | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 90-100 | PASS | Proceed to next phase |
| 70-89 | CONDITIONAL | Re-review after fixes |
| 0-69 | FAIL | Major revision needed |
Score Guidelines
| Score Range | Quality Level |
|---|---|
| 23-25 | Excellent - All claims have evidence |
| 18-22 | Acceptable - Most claims verified |
| 13-17 | Needs work - Multiple gaps |
| 0-12 | Insufficient - Major issues |
Output Format
## 📋 Design Document Review Result
### Total Score: {total}/100 {✅/⚠️/❌}
| Item | Score | Marker |
| ------------- | ----- | ------ |
| Accuracy | /25 | ✓/→/? |
| Completeness | /25 | ✓/→/? |
| Relevance | /25 | ✓/→/? |
| Actionability | /25 | ✓/→/? |
### 🔗 SOW ↔ Spec Consistency
| Check | Status |
| ------------------------ | ------ |
| Acceptance Criteria → FR | ✓/→/? |
| Risks → Mitigations | ✓/→/? |
| Dependencies | ✓/→/? |
| Test Coverage | ✓/→/? |
### 📝 Requested Modifications
🔴 Required: [list]
🟡 Recommended: [list]
### Next Action
✅ PASS: /code
⚠️ CONDITIONAL: Fix and re-review
❌ FAIL: Re-plan with /think
References
Related Skills
reviewing-readability- Readability review skill
Related Agents
sow-spec-reviewer- SOW/Spec verification agent
Used by Commands
/think- SOW/Spec generation/audit- Code review orchestration
