Marketplace

formatting-audits

Design document review format definition with 100-point scoring system. Provides quality evaluation criteria, scoring items, and pass/fail logic for SOW/Spec documents. Combined with confidence markers (✓/→/?) to clarify evaluation evidence. Triggers: SOW review, Spec review, document review, design review, ドキュメントレビュー, 設計レビュー, 90 points, scoring, grading, 品質評価, スコアリング, 合否判定.

allowed_tools: Read, Grep, Glob

$ Installer

git clone https://github.com/thkt/claude-config /tmp/claude-config && cp -r /tmp/claude-config/skills/formatting-audits ~/.claude/skills/claude-config

// tip: Run this command in your terminal to install the skill


name: formatting-audits description: > Design document review format definition with 100-point scoring system. Provides quality evaluation criteria, scoring items, and pass/fail logic for SOW/Spec documents. Combined with confidence markers (✓/→/?) to clarify evaluation evidence. Triggers: SOW review, Spec review, document review, design review, ドキュメントレビュー, 設計レビュー, 90 points, scoring, grading, 品質評価, スコアリング, 合否判定. allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob user-invocable: false

Review Format - Design Document Scoring

100-point scoring format for evaluating SOW/Spec document quality.

Scoring System

ItemScoreFocusCriteria
Accuracy0-25Facts vs inferences✓/→/? markers, evidence paths
Completeness0-25CoverageTestable criteria, risks, dependencies
Relevance0-25AlignmentGoals ↔ solutions, scope, YAGNI
Actionability0-25ImplementabilitySpecific steps, feasibility, next actions

Judgment Criteria

ScoreJudgmentAction
90-100PASSProceed to next phase
70-89CONDITIONALRe-review after fixes
0-69FAILMajor revision needed

Score Guidelines

Score RangeQuality Level
23-25Excellent - All claims have evidence
18-22Acceptable - Most claims verified
13-17Needs work - Multiple gaps
0-12Insufficient - Major issues

Output Format

## 📋 Design Document Review Result

### Total Score: {total}/100 {✅/⚠️/❌}

| Item          | Score | Marker |
| ------------- | ----- | ------ |
| Accuracy      | /25   | ✓/→/?  |
| Completeness  | /25   | ✓/→/?  |
| Relevance     | /25   | ✓/→/?  |
| Actionability | /25   | ✓/→/?  |

### 🔗 SOW ↔ Spec Consistency

| Check                    | Status |
| ------------------------ | ------ |
| Acceptance Criteria → FR | ✓/→/?  |
| Risks → Mitigations      | ✓/→/?  |
| Dependencies             | ✓/→/?  |
| Test Coverage            | ✓/→/?  |

### 📝 Requested Modifications

🔴 Required: [list]
🟡 Recommended: [list]

### Next Action

✅ PASS: /code
⚠️ CONDITIONAL: Fix and re-review
❌ FAIL: Re-plan with /think

References

Related Skills

  • reviewing-readability - Readability review skill

Related Agents

  • sow-spec-reviewer - SOW/Spec verification agent

Used by Commands

  • /think - SOW/Spec generation
  • /audit - Code review orchestration