Marketplace

research-driven-planning

Build plans anchored in research evidence, constraints, and validation gates.

allowed_tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Glob, Grep, Task, TodoWrite

model: sonnet

$ 설치

git clone https://github.com/DNYoussef/context-cascade /tmp/context-cascade && cp -r /tmp/context-cascade/skills/research/research-driven-planning ~/.claude/skills/context-cascade

// tip: Run this command in your terminal to install the skill

SKILL.md

View on GitHub →

name: research-driven-planning description: Build plans anchored in research evidence, constraints, and validation gates. allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Glob, Grep, Task, TodoWrite model: sonnet x-version: 3.2.0 x-category: research x-vcl-compliance: v3.1.1 x-cognitive-frames:

HON
MOR
COM
CLS
EVD
ASP
SPC

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Purpose

Create actionable plans whose milestones and decisions are backed by research evidence.
Surface constraints explicitly and enforce confidence ceilings on recommendations.
Maintain structure-first documentation for traceability.

Trigger Conditions

Positive: planning product/research work that must be evidence-based; prioritization aligned to findings.
Negative: purely operational project planning (route to delivery skills) or ad-hoc brainstorming (rapid-idea-generator).

Guardrails

HARD / SOFT / INFERRED constraints captured with sources and ownership.
Two-pass plan refinement: structure/milestones → epistemic validation against evidence and risks.
Recommendations carry confidence ceilings; assumptions documented.

Inputs

Goal and desired outcomes; available evidence and gaps.
Constraints (budget, time, compliance) and stakeholders.

Workflow

Frame & Evidence Audit: Capture objectives, constraint buckets, and existing evidence; flag gaps.
Plan Draft: Define milestones, owners, dependencies, and validation checkpoints linked to evidence.
Validation Pass: Stress-test against constraints, risks, and evidence strength; adjust sequencing.
Finalize & Communicate: Produce plan summary, risks, and next steps; store in references/examples.

Validation & Quality Gates

Evidence mapped to milestones; gaps highlighted with follow-ups.
Constraints addressed; INFERRED items assigned for confirmation.
Confidence ceilings attached to recommendations.

Response Template

**Goal & Constraints**
- HARD / SOFT / INFERRED.

**Plan**
- Milestones → evidence link → owner/checkpoint.

**Risks & Gaps**
- ...

**Next Steps**
- ...

Confidence: 0.80 (ceiling: inference 0.70) - based on evidence-backed planning.

Confidence: 0.80 (ceiling: inference 0.70) - reflects validated plan tied to evidence and constraints.